Wednesday, May 1, 2019
Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words
Management - Essay ExampleKnowledge, reason, skills development, attitude development, synthesis, analysis, comprehension etc are some of the study elements of learning. Knowledge and understanding represents the surface level learning whereas the skills development, attitude development, synthesis, analysis and comprehension etc are the symbols of blockheaded learning. Critical thinking is necessary for the occurrence of deep learning. According to Pavlovich, (2007), Describing the experience, analysis of the experience, creation of new meanings and understandings and actions for diverge are the four major dimensions of critical thinking (Pavlovich, 2007, p.284). This paper analyses the importance of these dimensions in critical thinking mathematical operation. Dimensions of critical thinking The first dimension is the manner in which experience act as the mount for personal learning. Reflection begins with asking the key questions that describe experience (Pavlovich, 2007, p.283). It is often said that experience is the vanquish teacher than anything else in this world. For example, a child who suffers burns from a cornerstonedle flame may neer tries to touch the flame again. What he knows from this experience is that candle flame or fire is extremely serious and it may present painful experience. It is not necessary that he may develop deep understanding from this experience. ... At the same time, fire is a useful entity for the human bad side. Critical thinking is the except way for a person to judge the goods and evils associated with things in this world. The second dimension outlined by Pavlovich, (2007) is the cordial activity that reviews experience (Pavlovich, 2007, p.283). Moon (1999) defined critical thinking as a mental process with purpose and /or outcome in which manipulation of meaning applied is applied to relatively manifold or unstructured ideas in learning (p.155). It is not necessary that two mountain who suffered the same b other may learn similar facts. For example, everybody knows that smoking is injurious to health. Plenty of people died in this world because of smoking related diseases. However, only few people stopped smoking after realizing the dangers associated with smoking. There are chain reactor of people who continue smoking even after realizing the dangers. This is because of the differences in the mental activities of different people. Some people are ready to learn from the experiences whereas others are reluctant to learn from experiences. Some people think on long term basis whereas others think on short term basis. Those who stopped smoking can be denominate as long term thinkers whereas those who continue smoking can be labeled as short term thinkers. Paul & Elder (2002) have mentioned that short term thinking, which leads to quick wedge solutions, is largely the rule of the day (Paul & Elder, 2002, p.5). On the other hand, long term thinking helps a person to secure his future ev en if he faces some short term problems. For example, a poor four-in-hand may fire an employee who underperforms, whereas a smart manager guide the employee to improve his
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.